LanceTek

Journal

Reviews of the tools I use to build for clients, written for the people paying for the work. Each one says what the tool is, what it costs you, and when I would not use it.

  • Why every agent I build asks before it acts

    Approval steps cost a few seconds each. Here is what they buy you, and where I would drop them.

    AI automation, 5 minute read

    Read the article

    Language models are good at reading a messy email and working out what the sender wants. They are also, occasionally, confidently wrong. In a business, the cost of a wrong reply to a customer is far higher than the cost of a person glancing at a draft.

    So the agents I build prepare the work and stop. You see the draft, the reason it was chosen and the data it used, and you press approve, edit or discard. Over a few weeks the log shows which kinds of message are always approved unchanged; those are the only ones I would consider letting through automatically, and only with your say-so.

    When I would drop the step: internal tidying jobs, like renaming files or filing receipts, where a mistake is cheap and easy to undo.

  • n8n for client automations: self-hosted, and what that means for your bill

    Per-task pricing adds up quickly. A look at when running your own workflow engine is worth the upkeep.

    Automation tools, 6 minute read

    Read the article

    Hosted automation services usually charge by the number of tasks run. That is fine at a few hundred a month and painful at tens of thousands. n8n does the same job, connecting your inbox, spreadsheets and accounts software, but can run on a small server you control, with no per-task fee.

    The trade-off is upkeep: someone has to update it and watch it. For clients on monthly care, that is me. For a business with two or three simple automations and low volume, a hosted service is often the better choice, and I will say so.

  • PostgreSQL is probably enough for your business

    Why I start nearly every project with one boring database, and what would make me add another.

    Databases, 4 minute read

    Read the article

    PostgreSQL has been developed in the open for decades, is free to use, and is supported by every hosting company worth using. It handles customer records, bookings, documents and search comfortably at small-business scale.

    One database means one thing to back up, one thing to secure and one thing the next developer needs to understand. I would add something else only for a specific, measured need, and I have not yet needed to on a small-business project.

  • Remote access without opening the office network: a look at Tailscale

    How staff can reach the office server from home without a traditional VPN box or ports left open to the internet.

    Infrastructure, 5 minute read

    Read the article

    The old way to reach an office server from home was to open a hole in the firewall, or buy a VPN appliance. Both need careful upkeep, and both are common ways in for attackers.

    Tailscale builds a private network between approved devices instead. Nothing is exposed to the wider internet, and removing a leaver’s access is a single click. It is free for very small teams and modestly priced per user above that; the main thing to weigh is that it relies on an outside company for coordination.

  • A backup you have never restored is a hope, not a backup

    How I set up restic for clients, and why the monthly test restore matters more than the tool.

    Infrastructure, 4 minute read

    Read the article

    restic takes encrypted, space-efficient backups and sends them to a second location: another building, or a cloud storage bucket. It is free and well-tested, and the encryption means the storage provider cannot read your data.

    The tool is the easy part. What protects you is a routine: once a month a backup is restored to a spare machine and checked. Clients on monthly care get a short note confirming it was done, and what was restored.

  • AI coding assistants on client work: what I let them do

    They make me faster. They do not write code I have not read. A note on how that affects your quote and your code.

    How I work, 6 minute read

    Read the article

    I use AI coding assistants, including Claude, for the repetitive parts of a build: boilerplate, tests, first drafts of routine screens. That time saving shows up in lower quotes.

    Every line still goes through me before it reaches your system, and your data is never pasted into a tool without your agreement. If your contract or sector rules out these tools entirely, tell me at the start and I will price the work without them.

Wondering whether one of these fits your business?

Ask. If the answer is a short email rather than a project, that is fine.

Ask a question